Friday, December 10, 2010

Blog 8

This story touched me in the fact that for so many years this country treated women as possessions. They were considered less than the animals in the field. Jordan has only the one woman district attorney. While reading this story it gave me hope that the women of Saudi Arabia are moving forward in more areas. Saudi women have been known for covering themselves and living in an era where women could be seen and not heard. They had no say in the life that they would lead. Everything was decided for them by either their father or their husband. This was not a country that was known for placing women in positions of power. Further into the story it details how women are in other positions of power and respect. There have been a number of changes since their American occupation. Chief District Attorney Barakat feels that this is a wonderful move forward for the women in Arab. They share a freedom that others look forward to enjoying. Please enjoy this story and to read more on it the web site is listed below.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/world/2010/12/09/jordan-names-woman-chief-district-attorney/#ixzz17lkEBh7O

Jordan Names First Woman Chief District Attorney

advertisement

Jordan on Thursday appointed a woman as chief district attorney of the country's capital, marking the first time a woman has held a top prosecutor's post in the pro-American Arab kingdom.

Ihsan Barakat, a 46-year-old judge and mother of two, will assume her post on Sunday, Jordan's Judicial Council said in a statement.

The council, which is the highest judicial authority in Jordan, said Barakat will lead a group of 60 prosecutors — which includes only one other woman — in the capital of Amman.

Only male district attorneys serve in other districts across Jordan.

Barakat, who has served as a judge on Jordan's appeals court for the past eight years, called her appointment "good news for women, not only in Jordan but across the Arab world, because it shows that there's no post confined to men in our societies."

"It will bolster women's role in society as a partner in building a better future," she said.

Women in Jordan enjoy more freedom in public life compared to their peers in Saudi Arabia. There are female lawmakers, Cabinet ministers, policewomen, secret service agents, air force pilots and businesswomen.


It is my hope that she is paid the same amount as prior Chief District Attorney. I am not sure if that is the case although I did try to see if there was more information about this story in other places. It is a desired move in the right direction. The job listed will give hope to girls all over with the desire to be more than a wife. This will open the door to their desire to go to school and be whatever they want to be when they grow up. Encouragement is a powerful thing. I am very happy for her, her family and the women of Jordan.

Saturday, November 27, 2010

Something to read

I thought about the story that was listed under extra credit and some of the stories that were in our book it seem fitting to see the other side. That side referencing those who see the hurt and pain of others then they get out there and do something about changing it to make a difference. This is a story one a few such people it is a little something honoring those who stand in gap for others. I know that there are times that we have to be our own cheerleaders. I am very happy that she was honored as well as the others. I will give the web address so that you may go out and read more on these people and the good work that they have done. It is very eye opening to read the links that some have gone to help another! It brings me joy to know that there are still people that are willing to lend a helping hand. There are still people when they see an injustice will not walk away because they don’t want to get involved. Sometimes getting involved can be very costly, but all have to follow our own moral compass.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/LIVING/11/21/cnnheroes.hero.of.year/?hpt=C2

Woman fighting sex slavery named CNN Hero of the Year
STORY HIGHLIGHTS

• Anuradha Koirala named 2010 CNN Hero of the Year at Los Angeles gala
• Gala included appearance by 33 Chilean miners and five of their rescuers
• John Legend, Bon Jovi and Sugarland performed; celebrity presenters included Demi Moore

• Fourth-annual event taped before an audience of nearly 5,000 at Shrine Auditorium
Editor's note: Watch "CNN Heroes: An All-Star Tribute" this weekend on the global networks of CNN. See full schedule below. Nominations for 2011 CNN Heroes are now open at CNNHeroes.com.

Los Angeles, California (CNN) -- A woman whose group has rescued more than 12,000 women and girls from sex slavery has been named the 2010 CNN Hero of the Year.
Anuradha Koirala was chosen by the public in an online poll that ran for eight weeks on CNN.com. CNN's Anderson Cooper revealed the result at the conclusion of the fourth annual "CNN Heroes: An All-Star Tribute."

"Human trafficking is a crime, a heinous crime, a shame to humanity," Koirala said earlier in the evening after being introduced as one of the top 10 CNN Heroes of 2010. "I ask everyone to join me to create a society free of trafficking. We need to do this for all our daughters."

Koirala was introduced by actress Demi Moore, who along with her husband, Ashton Kutcher, created DNA, The Demi and Ashton Foundation, which aims to eliminate child sex slavery worldwide.

"Every day this woman confronts the worst of what humanity has to offer," Moore said of Koirala. "She says, 'Stop. Stop selling our girls.' By raiding brothels and patrolling the India-Nepal border, she saves girls from being sold into the sex trade, where they are being repeatedly raped for profit, tortured and enslaved. "Since 1993, she has helped rescue more than 12,000 women and girls. Through her organization Maiti Nepal, she has provided more than a shelter for these girls and young women, she has created a home. It is a place for them to heal, go to school, learn a skill, and for some who are infected with HIV/AIDS, it is the place where they can spend their days surrounded by love." See Koirala's fan page on CNN Heroes Koirala will receive $100,000 to continue her work with Maiti Nepal, in addition to the $25,000 awarded to each of the top 10 Heroes honored. "This is another responsibility to me to work with all your support," Koirala told the audience after being named Hero of the Year. "We have to end this heinous crime. Please join hands with me to end this crime. ... Please try to respect the youth. They are the ones who are going to build the next generation. Thank you so much." Koirala's speech capped the gala event, which was taped November 20 before an audience of nearly 5,000 and premiered Thanksgiving night on the global networks of CNN.

The show opened with a salute to the 33 Chilean miners and five of the people who rescued them last month after the miners spent 69 days underground.

"For 69 days we were amazed by these 33 brave miners," Cooper said in welcoming the miners onto the Shrine stage. "Their ordeal was unthinkable; their rescue, unbelievable. No one has ever been trapped underground so deep for so long and survived.

"They endured a nightmare, experienced a miracle, and in the end became each others' brothers and heroes. On behalf of CNN Heroes, we salute all 33 Chilean miners." After the miners sang the Chilean national anthem, two of them -- speaking through a translator and holding the Chilean flag -- expressed their appreciation. "We want to thank the world, and we want to thank God for your prayers," Luis Urzua told the audience in Spanish.

"Our families suffered. Our children suffered, too. But thanks to the prayers of the whole world, we could come out of this difficulty," Mario Sepulveda added. "Some of our rescuers are here with us tonight," Urzua said. "Thank you for bringing us home. You are our heroes."

CNN brought the miners and their rescuers to the United States to attend the tribute show. The five rescuers were selected to represent the many thousands whose talent and effort led to the dramatic rescue.

The top 10 CNN Heroes, chosen by a blue-ribbon panel from an initial pool of more than 10,000 nominations from more than 100 countries, were each honored with a documentary tribute and introduced by a celebrity presenter. The program also featured performances by Grammy Award-winners Bon Jovi, John Legend and Sugarland.

Rock legends Bon Jovi performed "What Do You Got?," a new song from their greatest hits album, which came out earlier this month. Legend performed "Wake Up Everybody" along with hip-hop artist Common and R&B singer Melanie Fiona. Sugarland performed "Stand Up," a new song from their album "The Incredible Machine," which made its debut in October.

All three performances echoed the spirit of the CNN Heroes campaign, which salutes everyday people whose extraordinary accomplishments are making a difference in their communities and beyond.

Celebrity presenters included Halle Berry, Demi Moore, Jessica Alba, Kid Rock, LL Cool J, Renee Zellweger, Gerard Butler, Kiefer Sutherland, Marisa Tomei, Aaron Eckhart and Holly Robinson Peete.

"CNN Heroes has illustrated the best of humanity through the telling of stories of selfless acts of kindness, courage and perseverance" said Jim Walton, president of CNN Worldwide. "We are honored to bring these Heroes the recognition they so deserve. It is a program the entire CNN family is proud of and excited to share with our viewers on Thanksgiving night."

Again this year, producer/director Joel Gallen served as executive producer of "CNN Heroes: An All-Star Tribute." Among his credits, Gallen produced telethon events supporting victims of the Haiti earthquake, the 9/11 terrorist attacks and Hurricane Katrina. He won an Emmy Award and a Peabody Award for "America: A Tribute to Heroes." Preceding the tribute broadcast, CNN and HLN aired a red carpet special, "Showbiz Tonight @ CNN Heroes," at 7 p.m. ET/4 p.m. PT. Hosted by A.J. Hammer and Brooke Anderson, the special featured exclusive coverage of celebrity arrivals and interviews, as well as a celebrity-hosted social media suite tapping into the worldwide online passion and interest in the Heroes event.

Here are the 2010 top 10 CNN Heroes in alphabetical order:

Guadalupe Arizpe De La Vega founded a hospital in Juarez, Mexico, that cares for about 900 people daily -- regardless of their ability to pay. Despite the escalating violence in the city, the 74-year-old travels there several times a week to make sure residents get the care they need. Learn more about Guadalupe

Susan Burton was once caught in a cycle of addiction and incarceration. Today, her nonprofit A New Way of Life Reentry Project provides sober housing and other support services to formerly incarcerated women in California. Learn more about Susan

With her weight-loss challenge, Shape Up Vicksburg, Linda Fondren is helping her Mississippi hometown battle the bulge. Through free fitness activities and nutrition classes, residents have lost nearly 15,000 pounds to date. Learn more about Linda

Anuradha Koirala is fighting to prevent the trafficking and sexual exploitation of Nepal's women and girls. Since 1993, she and her group, Maiti Nepal, have helped rescue and rehabilitate more than 12,000 victims. Learn more about Anuradha Narayanan Krishnan brings hot meals and dignity to India's homeless and destitute -- 365 days per year -- through his nonprofit Akshaya Trust. Since 2002, he has served more than 1.2 million meals. Learn more about Narayanan

Since 1992, Magnus MacFarlane-Barrow has dedicated his life to helping people in need. Today, his program, Mary's Meals -- run from a tin shed in the Scottish highlands -- provides free daily meals to more than 400,000 children around the world. Learn more about Magnus

Harmon Parker is using his masonry skills to save lives. Since 1997 he has helped build 45 footbridges over perilous rivers in Kenya, protecting people from flash floods and predatory animals. The bridges also connect isolated villagers to valuable resources. Learn more about Harmon

Aki Ra is helping to make his native Cambodia safer by clearing land mines -- many of which he planted years ago as a child soldier. Since 1993, he and his Cambodian Self Help Demining organization have cleared about 50,000 mines and unexploded weapons. Learn more about Aki Ra

Evans Wadongo, 23, invented a way for rural families in Kenya to replace smoky kerosene and firelight with solar power. Through his Use Solar, Save Lives program, he's distributed an estimated 10,000 free solar lanterns. Learn more about Evans

Since 2005, Texas home builder Dan Wallrath has given injured Iraq and Afghanistan veterans homes of their own -- mortgage-free. He and his Operation Finally Home team have five new custom homes under construction. Learn more about Dan

To learn more about some of the people stated and the work that they have done you can go on the website and click on the name. The name should be highlighted in blue. They all are very interesting and bring so much to the lives that they touch. I was very happy to see that all of their hard work has not gone unnoticed. I am sure that none of these people did what they did to get noticed. I am very sure that they did it because it was the right thing to do. I say that I wanted to see them noticed so someone else can read their stories and think of what they can do to also give a helping hand. Every little bit counts. Just reading about these people is encouraging to me to continue to help the group of young people that I work with daily.

Tuesday, November 23, 2010

Blog 7

After reading some of the comments on the discussion board I though about this story. It is a story of a mother, daughter and a lover. Now it is not the way that you think that it should be. These women were both dating the same man. The ladies were not aware of things, but when the mother became aware she wanted to hire someone to kill the lover. Now it that was not bad enough. The lover was a famous rugby player. After the initial hearing the courts asked the women to go in for a psychological test. This story when I read of it. I could see were the judge just over looked some of the key things that may be brought out when they go back to court in January 2011. I found it very interesting that she was released and after the manner in which they arrested her. It is very interesting. During the story the lover in question had nothing to say on his behalf. We only are left with the actions of the betrayed women. There wasn't any comments on his actions. I don't feel that any one should have the right to take another person's life, but I do think that he should have said something to take ownership of what he did. Because this woman felt desperate and acted on her emotions she now will face the court systems for that, but what if anything will happen to the man? He is left to say oh I could not choose between the mother or the daughter so I had both. No I am sorry for my actions and the things that lead to what has taken place. No apology to the girl for the lost of her mother.

This guy gets to play the victim when if he had have been truthful and stayed away from one or the other or both they would not have the current situation. It is something to make you think. Here is the story below and the link I got the information from.
************************************************************************************
http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/africa/11/23/south.africa.rugby.murder/index.html

Woman accused in rugby star's murder plot to undergo psychiatric test
By Nkepile Mabuse, CNN
STORY HIGHLIGHTS

* Woman is free on bail after being arrested last week
* The case also involves witchcraft and a faked murder scene, police say
* Police say they have messages from woman urging hitmen to carry out the murder

RELATED TOPICS

* South Africa

Pretoria, South Africa (CNN) -- A South African court has ordered a 47-year-old woman to undergo a psychiatric evaluation after she was arrested for allegedly plotting to kill promising rugby player, Deon Helberg.

Amanda Reyneke is believed to have had an affair with the 21-year-old Blue Bulls wing while he was dating her daughter, police said.

Jalien Reyneke is a university student and model who apparently broke up with Helberg after finding out that he was in a relationship with her mother, according to police.

Helberg is not talking publicly, but his alleged relationship with the Reynekes has South Africans gripped. The love triangle that could have possibly ended in death has been making headlines since Amanda Reyneke's dramatic and public arrest last Thursday.

Investigators say she promised to pay two Nigerian men $17,000 to kill Helberg, but her plot was foiled when the men notified police.

With the help of the rugby player, a crime scene designed to make it appear that he was dead was constructed by police and pictures were sent to Amanda Reyneke by the would-be assassins. When she agreed to meet them to give them their pay for the murder, police pounced, taking all three into custody.

The Nigerians are now state witnesses and will testify against Amanda Reyneke, police said. During her first court appearance Monday, text messages allegedly sent by her to the two hired hitmen were read out in Pretoria Magistrate's Court.

One of them, apparently urging the two men to carry out the killing, read: "I'm sorry to tell you that this job still needs to be done."

Police said prosecutors plan to use the messages to prove she wanted Helberg dead. Some of the texts allegedly revealed that she may have dabbled in witchcraft, and one indicated she had been in contact with witch doctors.

The judge in the case ordered Amanda Reyneke to check herself into a psychiatric facility for a mental evaluation, but allowed her to go free on bail.

Outside the courthouse, her lawyer spoke to CNN but did not divulge many details about the case.

"We will give you the real story when we go to court," said attorney Jaques Beetge.

To add to the intrigue, Amanda Reyneke -- after dodging a gaggle of reporters as she walked out of the courthouse Monday -- ducked into a car driven by her daughter. She kissed her daughter on the cheek and the two drove away.

Amanda Reyneke is due in court again in January.
***********************************************************************************

There is a comment page and for this story the comments being left are for the fact that the guy got away with trying the mother and the daughter. That is one of the big laughs and then there are some that feel that this women will get off free. One person stated that if a man plots to kill a person he goes to jail and bail is set at an extremely high point. A women does the same thing and she has to see a doctor. Then his last comment is that she may get off free. No one in the group want to address the fact that what this man did was wrong. The fact that he caused pain that would have never been there had he kept his pants up has never come up in the comments. Again I don't think that I would plot to kill the guy, but he need to take up some of the responsibility of his actions and the damage that it has caused.

Friday, November 12, 2010

Blog 6

I was thinking about the meaning behind all that we have as Americans and those things that our war vets have done to keep us safe. In honor of them and all that they have done I wanted to see re-visit a story on our first ever female POW/MIA. The story of Jessica Lynch is powerful and very unforgettable. I thank everyone who has ever given their time or energy to serve in order that I might have the liberty to enjoy an education and my family. Jessica's story below and a link to her information.

The truth about Jessica http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2003/may/15/iraq.usa2

Her Iraqi guards had long fled, she was being well cared for - and doctors had already tried to free her. John Kampfner discovers the real story behind a modern American war myth

*
* Share46
* Reddit
* Buzz up

* John Kampfner
* The Guardian, Thursday 15 May 2003 08.27 BST
* Article history

Jessica Lynch became an icon of the war. An all-American heroine, the story of her capture by the Iraqis and her rescue by US special forces became one of the great patriotic moments of the conflict. It couldn't have happened at a more crucial moment, when the talk was of coalition forces bogged down, of a victory too slow in coming.

Her rescue will go down as one of the most stunning pieces of news management yet conceived. It provides a remarkable insight into the real influence of Hollywood producers on the Pentagon's media managers, and has produced a template from which America hopes to present its future wars.

But the American media tactics, culminating in the Lynch episode, infuriated the British, who were supposed to be working alongside them in Doha, Qatar. This Sunday, the BBC's Correspondent programme reveals the inside story of the rescue that may not have been as heroic as portrayed, and of divisions at the heart of the allies' media operation.

"In reality we had two different styles of news media management," says Group Captain Al Lockwood, the British army spokesman at central command. "I feel fortunate to have been part of the UK one."

In the early hours of April 2, correspondents in Doha were summoned from their beds to Centcom, the military and media nerve centre for the war. Jim Wilkinson, the White House's top figure there, had stayed up all night. "We had a situation where there was a lot of hot news," he recalls. "The president had been briefed, as had the secretary of defence."

The journalists rushed in, thinking Saddam had been captured. The story they were told instead has entered American folklore. Private Lynch, a 19-year-old clerk from Palestine, West Virginia, was a member of the US Army's 507th Ordnance Maintenance Company that took a wrong turning near Nassiriya and was ambushed. Nine of her US comrades were killed. Iraqi soldiers took Lynch to the local hospital, which was swarming with fedayeen, where he was held for eight days. That much is uncontested.

Releasing its five-minute film to the networks, the Pentagon claimed that Lynch had stab and bullet wounds, and that she had been slapped about on her hospital bed and interrogated. It was only thanks to a courageous Iraqi lawyer, Mohammed Odeh al-Rehaief, that she was saved. According to the Pentagon, Al-Rehaief risked his life to alert the Americans that Lynch was being held.

Just after midnight, Army Rangers and Navy Seals stormed the Nassiriya hospital. Their "daring" assault on enemy territory was captured by the military's night-vision camera. They were said to have come under fire, but they made it to Lynch and whisked her away by helicopter. That was the message beamed back to viewers within hours of the rescue.

Al-Rehaief was granted asylum barely two weeks after arriving in the US. He is now the toast of Washington, with a fat $500,000 (£309,000) book deal. Rescue in Nassiriya will be published in October. As for Lynch, her status as cult hero is stronger than ever. Internet auction sites have listed at least 10 Jessica Lynch items, ranging from an oil painting with an opening bid of $200 to a $5 "America Loves Jessica Lynch" fridge magnet. Trouble is that doctors now say she has no recollection of the whole episode and probably never will. Her memory loss means that "researchers" have been called in to fill in the gaps.

One story, two versions. The doctors in Nassiriya say they provided the best treatment they could for Lynch in the midst of war. She was assigned the only specialist bed in the hospital, and one of only two nurses on the floor. "I was like a mother to her and she was like a daughter,"says Khalida Shinah.

"We gave her three bottles of blood, two of them from the medical staff because there was no blood at this time,"said Dr Harith al-Houssona, who looked after her throughout her ordeal. "I examined her, I saw she had a broken arm, a broken thigh and a dislocated ankle. Then I did another examination. There was no [sign of] shooting, no bullet inside her body, no stab wound - only RTA, road traffic accident," he recalled. "They want to distort the picture. I don't know why they think there is some benefit in saying she has a bullet injury."

The doctors told us that the day before the special forces swooped on the hospital the Iraqi military had fled. Hassam Hamoud, a waiter at a local restaurant, said he saw the American advance party land in the town. He said the team's Arabic interpreter asked him where the hospital was. "He asked: 'Are there any Fedayeen over there?' and I said, 'No'." All the same, the next day "America's finest warriors" descended on the building.

"We heard the noise of helicopters," says Dr Anmar Uday. He says that they must have known there would be no resistance. "We were surprised. Why do this? There was no military, there were no soldiers in the hospital.

"It was like a Hollywood film. They cried, 'Go, go, go', with guns and blanks and the sound of explosions. They made a show - an action movie like Sylvester Stallone or Jackie Chan, with jumping and shouting, breaking down doors." All the time with the camera rolling. The Americans took no chances, restraining doctors and a patient who was handcuffed to a bed frame.

There was one more twist. Two days before the snatch squad arrived, Al-Houssona had arranged to deliver Jessica to the Americans in an ambulance. "I told her I will try and help you escape to the American Army but I will do this very secretly because I could lose my life." He put her in an ambulance and instructed the driver to go to the American checkpoint. When he was approaching it, the Americans opened fire. They fled just in time back to the hospital. The Americans had almost killed their prize catch.

A military cameraman had shot footage of the rescue. It was a race against time for the video to be edited. The video presentation was ready a few hours after the first brief announcement. When it was shown, General Vincent Brooks, the US spokesman in Doha, declared: "Some brave souls put their lives on the line to make this happen, loyal to a creed that they know that they'll never leave a fallen comrade."

None of the details that the doctors provided Correspondent with made it to the video or to any subsequent explanations or clarifications by US authorities. I asked the Pentagon spokesman in Washington, Bryan Whitman, to release the full tape of the rescue, rather than its edited version, to clear up any discrepancies. He declined. Whitman would not talk about what kind of Iraqi resistance the American forces faced. Nor would he comment on the injuries Lynch actually sustained. "I understand there is some conflicting information out there and in due time the full story will be told, I'm sure," he told me.

That American approach - to skim over the details - focusing instead on the broad message, led to tension behind the scenes with the British. Downing Street's man in Doha, Simon Wren, was furious that on the first few days of the war the Americans refused to give any information at Centcom. The British were put in the difficult position of having to fill in the gaps, off the record.

Towards the end of the conflict, Wren wrote a confidential five-page letter to Alastair Campbell complaining that the American briefers weren't up to the job. He described the Lynch presentation as embarrassing.

Wren yesterday described the Lynch incident as "hugely overblown" and symptomatic of a bigger problem. "The Americans never got out there and explained what was going on in the war," he said. "All they needed to be was open and honest. They were too vague, too scared of engaging with the media." He said US journalists "did not put them under pressure".

Wren, who had been seconded to the Ministry of Defence, said he tried on several occasions to persuade Wilkinson and Brooks to change tack. In London, Campbell did the same with the White House, to no avail. "The American media didn't put them under pressure so they were allowed to get away with it," Wren said. "They didn't feel they needed to change."

He acknowledged that the events surrounding the Lynch "rescue" had become a matter of "conjecture". But he added: "Either way, it was not the main news of the day. This was just one soldier, this was an add-on: human interest stuff. It completely overshadowed other events, things that were actually going on on the battlefield. It overshadowed the fact that the Americans found the bodies of her colleagues. What we wanted to give out was real-time news."

Lockwood told Correspondent:"Having lost the first skirmish, they (the Americans) had pretty much lost the war when it came to media support. Albeit things had got better and everything came to a conclusion quite rapidly, but to my feelings they lost their initial part of the campaign and never got on the front foot again," Lockwood said. "The media adviser we had here [Wren] was an expert in his field. His counterpart on the US side [Wilkinson] was evasive and was not around as much as he should have been when it came to talking to the media."

The American strategy was to concentrate on the visuals and to get a broad message out. Details - where helpful - followed behind. The key was to ensure the right television footage. The embedded reporters could do some of that. On other missions, the military used their own cameras, editing the film themselves and presenting it to broadcasters as ready-to-go pack ages. The Pentagon had been influenced by Hollywood producers of reality TV and action movies, notably Black Hawk Down.

Back in 2001, the man behind Black Hawk Down, Jerry Bruckheimer, had visited the Pentagon to pitch an idea. Bruckheimer and fellow producer Bertram van Munster, who masterminded the reality show Cops, suggested Profiles from the Front Line, a primetime television series following US forces in Afghanistan. They were after human stories told through the eyes of the soldiers. Van Munster's aim was to get close and personal. He said: "You can only get accepted by these people through chemistry. You have to have a bond with somebody. Only then will they let you in. What these guys are doing out there, these men and women, is just extraordinary. If you're a cheerleader of our point of view - that we deserve peace and that we deal with human dignity - then these guys are really going out on a limb and risking their own lives."

It was perfect reality TV, made with the active cooperation of Donald Rumsfeld and aired just before the Iraqi war. The Pentagon liked what it saw. "What Profiles does is given another in depth look at what forces are doing from the ground," says Whitman. "It provides a very human look at challenges that are presented when you are dealing in these very difficult situations." That approached was taken on and developed on the field of battle in Iraq.

The Pentagon has none of the British misgivings about its media operation. It is convinced that what worked with Jessica Lynch and with other episodes of this war will work even better in the future.


For more on Jessica Lynch her private blog : http://www.jessica-lynch.com

Thank you for reading. Thank you Jessica for serving!

Monday, October 25, 2010

Blog 5

Listening to the controversy in 1991 in reference to Anita Hill and then court hopeful Clarence Thomas, I thought then that there is no way I would want to have Clarence Thomas as a Supreme Court Justice. After these last nine years I still stand on that thought. What holds me to this thought is not the new actions performed by his wife Ginni Thomas. It was his actions and how things were then swept up under the rug and they are still in that era. The case I felt was a "go" card for some men to say and do as they pleased considering that nothing really happened to this Judge. He was in a way given an award for his actions. It was not a full week in behind his accusations becoming public (and the hearings where testimony was given that he just denied happened and they kind of in a way just took his word for things) before it was made official that he was to be the next Supreme Justice. I was out raged. How could someone with that type of reputation have office to set in Judgment of others? I think that during this case some of the people who were in charge of helping to select the next court Justice did not want to seem racist in their selection. Because the next judge would replace Justice Thurgood Marshall, they wanted to maintain the status quote. Thomas had the nerve to be upset that they were taking the time to investigate this matter. I still don't feel that Ms Hill received the justice that she deserved.

Now coming full circle Justice Thomas wife Ginni Thomas decided that she would after all of these years demand an apology from Ms. Hill and a full account of what it was that she did with her husband. I would have thought that she should have spoken with her husband years ago. The time of stand by my man has long been over. The story is one that took place 19 years ago. Mrs. Thomas took time to look Ms. Hill up and contact her at her home. She claimed it was an olive branch, but the wording did not come off as kind. I felt that she was being demanding and condescending toward Ms. Hill. One of the few things that were positive from this case was that it was recognized that there really wasn't a lot of women in the Senate and some changes were made to accommodate that, but at the cost of someone's pain and suffering I don't think that was fair. It was a passionate story and I have copied it into this blog along with the website. If you would like to look it up for yourself you can find it at:

http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/10/20/scotus.thomas.hill/index.html?npt=NP1


Anita Hill: No apology coming for Thomas testimony
By the CNN Wire Staff
STORY HIGHLIGHTS

* Hill's testimony in 1991 almost sank Clarence Thomas' Supreme Court nomination
* Ginni Thomas says she reached out to Hill to extend "an olive branch"
* Hill says she won't apologize

Boston, Massachusetts (CNN) -- Anita Hill, whose accusations of sexual harassment almost derailed Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas' high court nomination, has no plans to apologize for the charges she made nearly two decades ago.

The response from Hill, now a law professor at Brandeis University in Waltham, Massachusetts, comes following a voice-mail message left for her by Thomas' wife, Virginia, over the weekend, requesting an apology.

Charles Radin, the Brandeis director of news and communications, said Hill received the voice mail and turned it over to the campus Department of Public Safety, which then turned it over to the FBI.

Special Agent Jason Pack, an FBI spokesman in Washington, declined to comment late Tuesday.

"I certainly thought the call was inappropriate," Hill said in a statement to CNN issued by Brandeis. "I have no intention of apologizing because I testified truthfully about my experience and I stand by that testimony."

In a statement to CNN, Virginia "Ginni" Thomas said: "I did place a call to Ms. Hill at her office extending an olive branch to her after all these years, in hopes that we could ultimately get passed what happened so long ago. That offer still stands, I would be very happy to meet and talk with her if she would be willing to do the same. Certainly no offense was ever intended."

According to a source at Brandeis, who spoke on condition of not being identified, the message left over the weekend said:

"Good morning, Anita Hill, it's Ginni Thomas. I just wanted to reach across the airwaves and the years and ask you to consider something. I would love you to consider an apology some time and some full explanation of why you did what you did with my husband. So give it some thought and certainly pray about this and come to understand why you did what you did. OK, have a good day."

Virginia Thomas is a conservative activist who founded the organization Liberty Central.

Hill declined comment to CNN affiliate WCVB outside her Waltham home on Wednesday, saying, "Please, let me go teach my class."

Then-President George H.W. Bush nominated Clarence Thomas -- a then-43-year-old conservative from Pinpoint, Georgia -- to the Supreme Court in 1991.

The nomination was "instantly controversial," according to an outline of the incident posted on the website for the Center for History and New Media, part of a history class syllabus.

African-American organizations, including the NAACP and the Urban League, opposed it, fearing that Thomas' conservative stance on issues such as affirmative action would reverse gains his predecessor, Justice Thurgood Marshall, had helped achieve, the outline said.

However, the nomination proceeded to the Senate Judiciary Committee, where the first few days of his confirmation hearings were uneventful, according to the historical account. "When asked about his stance on legal abortion, [Clarence] Thomas claimed that he had not formulated an opinion and the issue was dropped."

The nomination went before the full Senate, but a media frenzy developed when Hill -- then a law professor at the University of Oklahoma -- came forward and alleged that Thomas had sexually harassed her years earlier, when he was head of the Equal Employment Opportunities Commission and she worked for him, the outline said. The Senate Judiciary Committee launched an investigation.

Hill actually had made the allegations during interviews with the FBI, but they were leaked to the press just before the final Senate vote on Clarence Thomas, according to the Museum of Broadcast Communications' website. The Senate delayed the vote in order to hear more about Hill's allegations.

In three days of televised hearings that transfixed Americans, Hill testified that Thomas repeatedly requested dates with her and engaged in inappropriate discussions including references to pornographic material.

In his testimony, Clarence Thomas denied the allegations and called the hearings "a national disgrace ... a high-tech lynching for uppity blacks who in any way deign to think for themselves, to do for themselves," according to the museum.

Two days later, Clarence Thomas was confirmed on a 52-48 vote.

"Although the hearings themselves had no legal significance, to many observers they symbolized a public referendum on sexual harassment and other gender inequities in late twentieth-century America," according to the broadcast museum. The incident has been credited with increasing public awareness regarding gender discrimination and motivating female voters in the 1992 elections, which saw a record 29 women elected to Congress.

"Many feminist groups refer to Anita Hill as the mother of a new wave of awareness of gender discrimination, particularly given the attacks on her credibility that she withstood from the white male senators," the museum said.

Harriett Woods, then-president of the National Women's Political Caucus, was quoted by the museum as saying, "Anita Hill focused attention on the fact that there were no women in that Senate panel making decisions about people's lives."

Thank you so much for reading my blog. I think that some instances of forward motion was created after the Clarence Thomas and Anita Hill talks. I would have liked to see more done on behalf of women. Sexual harassment is not something that many can easily recover from. Anita Hill had to over come the harassment as well and the attacks on her credibility both during the investigatory talks, I am sure that it would have come up for any type of job interview and from others around her as she was living her life. The thoughts of some was because Thomas got off she must have lied. She still states her innocence and maintains a positive out look. Considering the invasion of her privacy by Justice Thomas wife Ginni, I think it is not a position that I would have held so eloquently as she.

Saturday, October 9, 2010

Blog 4

Reading about this woman who just wanted to help others who's life was ended by her kidnappers really opened my eyes to the plight of women in other countries. I wish that there was more information in the news when these types of tragedies occur. I don't remember reading anything in the news about her being kidnapped. Life is so precious and to have it end so quickly is hard to take. I wonder what her family is going to be able to do for her. She was a British National and yet they could not get anyone over there to safe her.

What are we willing to pay for a life. I know that we can not give in to every nut case that holds someone for ransom, but what can we do to stop it? I had a friend who recently past. We had her memorial service yesterday. I wish I had the time to tell her how wonderful I thought she was. Reading on how much Linda cared about these people and what she was willing to do to continue to help them reminded me of my friend Brittany. These two women I can say were very selfless. Willing to do whatever they could including giving up their life's for others.

Linda lost her life trying to escape from her kidnappers. At the time she went on the only information that she had. She was kidnapped with three other men who were set free days ago and she could only go on the facts she had. Living in Afghanistan a woman's life is worth very little. Women are still in some areas considered property. They have little to look forward to in the way of owning their own homes, they have limited jobs that the can obtain, and the living there depends on your status. Linda being a white woman really stood no chance beyond trying in some way to get away. A case of being in the wrong place at the wrong time. She wanted to lift the living status of the people there and the cost was great. I am truly sorry for her families loss. This will hopefully bring to light the treatment of people in Afghanistan. The story is below along with the web page so others can go on and get more information on this.


London, England (CNN) -- A British aid worker held hostage in eastern Afghanistan since late last month was killed by her captors during a rescue attempt on Friday night, officials said.

The woman was identified as Linda Norgrove, who worked for DAI -- an agency that provides various services to developing nations. Norgrove, who was age 36, spent much of her career managing projects for farmers and rural workers.

James Boomgard, DAI president and chief executive officer, called the news "devastating" and said his operation is "saddened beyond words by the death of a wonderful woman whose sole purpose in Afghanistan was to do good.".

"Linda loved Afghanistan and cared deeply for its people, and she was deeply committed to her development mission. She was an inspiration to many of us here at DAI and she will be deeply missed."

British Prime Minister David Cameron said in a statement that Norgrove "was doing valuable work for the Afghan people."

"Decisions on operations to free hostages are always difficult. But where a British life is in such danger, and where we and our allies can act, I believe it is right to try. I pay tribute to the courage and skill of all those involved in this effort," he said.

British Foreign Secretary William Hague said in a written statement that his forces received information about where she was held and "decided that, given the danger she was facing, her best chance of safe release was to act on that information,"

"Responsibility for this tragic outcome rests squarely with the hostage takers. From the moment they took her, her life was under grave threat. Given who held her, and the danger she was in, we judged that Linda's best chance lay in attempting to rescue her."

Norgrove was being held by two Taliban commanders, Mullah Basir and Mullah Keftan, who were both killed in the raid, an Afghan intelligence official said.

An Afghan official said last month that the British woman, two Afghan drivers and a security guard had been kidnapped after an exchange of gunfire September 26 in the Chawkay district of eastern Kunar province.

Abdul Marjan Adel, a local provincial official, had said that the four were being held in a "very remote area," and that Afghan and international forces were looking for them. He said they were healthy and located in the Dewcar valley.

Provincial officials had created a council of district elders, religious scholars and provincial council members to negotiate with the abductors, he said.

The three Afghans kidnapped with Norgrove had been released days ago, according to another Afghan intelligence official and a local provincial government official.

Hague expressed his gratitude to NATO allies and Afghan forces "for doing all they could to secure the safe release of the woman."

"Hostage taking is never justified and the UK does not make concessions to hostage-takers. But whenever British nationals are kidnapped, we and our allies will do everything in our power to free them," he said.

DAI said Norgrove worked in projects around the world, including Afghanistan, Laos, Mexico, Uganda, and Peru, and was involved in projects for the United Nations.

She joined DAI in January and has been a senior manager on a program to create jobs, improve local economies and help local leaders "reduce reliance on the opium economy," the group said in a statement.

Gen. David H. Petraeus, the ISAF commander passed along his condolences.

"Afghan and coalition security forces did everything in their power to rescue Linda," Petraeus said. "Linda was a courageous person with a passion to improve the lives of Afghan people, and sadly she lost her life in their service. Our thoughts and prayers are with her family during this difficult time."

Last year, British troops freed New York Times journalist Stephen Farrell from Taliban captivity in a raid but his interpreter, Sultan Munadi, died in the rescue effort. A British commando was also killed, as were a woman and child.

Security forces in Afghanistan this week captured a Taliban leader who was "directly involved" in the kidnapping, NATO's International Security Assistance Force said.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/asiapcf/10/09/afghanistan.british.worker.death/index.html?hpt=T2

Friday, September 24, 2010

Blog 3

Blog 3

I noticed that is week the news has been filled with interesting stories. One that caught my attention was the story that was very close to home. A mother that had at least five children locked four of them in a closet for punishment. While there is much that could be said for how she chose to correct the behaviors of her kids. What I am finding surprising is how little her neighbors knew about her and her children. The story did not go into detail about how long they lived in the home, but some of the neighbors did say that the kids rarely came out to play. What should be said is that she is an immigrant from Somalia who was left alone with five kids while her husband was away in Africa. The story goes into how the mother left the kids for 10 hours to go shopping. The mother was 28 years old with small children and little to no support system. She had her family members and friends. What I am thinking that is so different from anything that I could think of is that fact that one the father was gone for a month to visit family in another country. Then it was the uncle who said that she should feed the kids. I would think that if they found anything wrong with the kids that they would step in and help her, but that is not what happened in this case. She was left to her own to try and figure out how to take care of the family on her own. The Father a cab driver in Indy was not there to help. Reportedly she locked them in often when she was cooking or when they were being punished. I got the feel that really the mother was the only contact that the children had for guidance, love or direction.

What I wanted to see more of was what was her support system? I am a mother of six kids with three more through marriage which is a total of nine. Scary for some, but I am the oldest sister of nine siblings. I know who hard it is to raise a large family and with zero support it can be even harder. You make difficult decisions. From the looks of the woman when she came into court she was very malnutrition herself. Her eyes were sunk in and she looked to be skin and bones. The uncle is stated to have said he told her she should feed the kids, but with what would have been my question. The statement went on to say she agreed with the uncle, he went on to say that he told her this because the kids looked as if they had not been feed. Now we have this case and really we are at the start of everything it leaves so many questions. The kids were of school age why was this not reported by a teacher or had she not been here long enough to enroll the kids in school. The next question would be had she become a citizen yet? Did the children have citizenship? They are now in custody, but if they are not citizens will they be deported? The father is on his way back to the US, but will he even be able to get custody back? How did they live before this incident? Were there any signs to say that she needed help.

According to the statement from friends they live in a tight community and will not give a statement on her behave or against her. They would like to be left alone. Well if your so close why did they not try to help her with the children? They were in need of services and from the looks of things that was not given. It brings to mind how little help we as women receive. There are services, but in order to get them there is a process that needs to be followed. These services require most times that the person be a citizen of the United States in order to receive them. Women have historically been set in the position of nurturer. They are the ones set in place to having to take care of the children and make sure that their needs are met while men take care of going out to get the jobs and provide. While this may have even been the case for this couple why was she left to do what seems like everything by her self? This story has so many sides and just reading about it tends to anger me on behalf of the kids, the loss of life and the mother. I know that the father and other family members are experiencing a loss as well. The story is listed below please read a post your comments.


Girl knew 2 siblings died in Indy closet


Click here to find out more!
By Deanna Martin
of The Associated Press

INDIANAPOLIS — A 7-year-old Indianapolis girl told investigators she and her siblings usually slept when barricaded in an apartment closet by their mother, but last weekend she called out for the woman to open the door after realizing her brother and sister had died, according to court documents released Thursday.

Ebyan Farah, 28, is charged with eight counts of neglect and confinement. A Marion County judge entered a preliminary not guilty plea on her behalf during a brief Thursday hearing, during which Farah hung her head and looked down at the floor.

Defense attorneys requested a gag order for the case and private autopsies for Farah’s 4-year-old daughter, Zuhur Farah Hassan, and 3-year-old son, Zakariya Farah Hassan. Her three other children have been placed in foster care, but a lawyer for her husband said he returned this week from a visit to Africa and is seeking to regain custody.

The attorneys issued a statement to Indianapolis media saying relatives of Farah, an immigrant from Somalia, are “devastated and shocked by this tragedy.”

“We are a tight community, and we believe with God’s help that we will face this tragedy with strength and faith,” Farah’s uncle, Mohammed Hersi, said in the statement.

Farah’s attorneys said they would have no further comment until the judge rules on the gag order.

Authorities have said Farah told police she “was not in her right mind” when she allegedly placed her children in a 6-foot-by- 1 1/2 -foot upstairs closet at Manchester Village Apartments about 6 a.m. Sunday. Court documents say Farah put a bed frame or mattress against the closet door to keep the children from leaving while she went to visit a friend for the day.

Seven-year-old Muntaaz Farah Hassan told investigators her mother often put children in the closet as punishment or when she needed to cook, according to a police affidavit. The girl said she sometimes helped her mother get the children in the closet when they got into trouble.

The girl said she had a hard time breathing in the hot, dark closet Sunday and that no food and water had been left for her and three of her four siblings, according to the affidavit. Muntaaz said her youngest brother, who turns 2 next month, was not there.

Authorities said earlier in the week that all five children were believed to be in the closet, but did not immediately return messages seeking an explanation for the discrepancy Thursday.

Muntaaz told investigators she believed her brother and sister died while all four children were sleeping. She said when she realized it, she called for her mother, who then opened the door.

Farah told police she opened the closet door about 4:20 p.m., according to the affidavit. Muntaaz said she watched her mother carry the dead children downstairs, the affidavit said.

Hersi told police he called to check in on his niece Sunday evening.

“I did something wrong,” Farah said and began crying, according to affidavit.

Police were called after Hersi went to the home, looked inside and saw one of the dead children on the couch. A police report said medics found both children “in full rigor mortis” and with no pulse.

Autopsies on the children found no blunt force trauma and Dr. John Daniels determined they did not die of natural causes or disease, according to the probable-cause affidavit. Daniels is waiting on toxicology tests to help determine a cause of death but listed several possible factors: high temperatures in the closet, positional asphyxia, a possible low level of oxygen and the additional complication of malnutrition.

The children’s weights were found to be in the lower 25th percentile based on height and weight, according to the affidavit. Hersi recently told Farah she needed to feed the children because he feared they might die from not eating, and Farah told detectives she understood what her uncle was saying and agreed with him, according to the affidavit.

Farah said she had been feeding her children but hasn’t been feeding herself recently, the affidavit said.

Her defense attorneys say they have requested private autopsies in an effort to learn the contents of the children’s stomachs.


http://www.newsrunner.com/display-article/?eUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.news-sentinel.com%2Fapps%2Fpbcs.dll%2Farticle%3FAID%3D%2FSE%2F20100924%2FNEWS%2F9240321&eSrc=The+News-Sentinel+-+Fort+Wayne+IN&eTitle=Girl+knew+2+siblings+died+in+Indy+closet

Friday, September 10, 2010

Blog 2

Sep 10, 9:26 PM EDT

Iran postpones American woman's release

By NASSER KARIMI
Associated Press Writer

Iran to Free American Hiker for Holiday Clemency
Advertisement

Latest News

TEHRAN, Iran (AP) -- Iran on Friday postponed the planned release of an American woman jailed along with two friends for more than a year, state media reported, dealing a blow to the hopes of three U.S. mothers who have pleaded for the trio's freedom.

Iranian officials had said that Sarah Shourd, who was detained with her friends near Iran's border with Iraq, would be released on Saturday. But the IRNA state news agency quoted the deputy chief of communication for the Iranian president's office, Mohammed Hassan Salilhimaram, as saying that would not happen.

He said details of the decision would be announced later, but Tehran's chief prosecutor, Abbas Jafari Dolatabadi, blamed the fact that "judicial procedures have not been done," according to the semiofficial ILNA news agency.

It was the latest in a series of mixed messages from Tehran in a case that has deepened tensions between the U.S. and Iran, a relationship already strained over Washington's suspicions that Tehran is trying to manufacture nuclear weapons - something Iran denies.

Shourd and two friends, Shane Bauer and Josh Fattal, were arrested along the Iran-Iraq border in July 2009, and Tehran has accused them of illegally crossing the border and spying. Their families say they were hiking in Iraq's scenic north and that if they crossed the border, they did so unwittingly.

The U.S. State Department and relatives said they had no immediate information about the reports.

The announcement of the delay came hours after state media reported that President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had personally intervened to secure Shourd's release as an act of clemency in part because of the "special viewpoint of the Islamic Republic of Iran on the dignity of women."

Patrick Clawson, deputy director at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, said the last-minute quarrels over Shroud's release highlight the internal fissures in Iran's power structure between Ahmadinejad and others such as the prosecutor who could see him overreaching his authority.

"There are all kinds of internal pressures," he said. "A case like this shows there are various factions at play."

A judicial official close to the prosecutor's office said that Dolatabadi believes the release is unacceptable because Shourd should first stand before the court and then the amnesty will be granted.

The official spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the issue.

Shourd's name was not among the official list of prisoners freed at the end of the Islamic holy month of Ramadan, suggesting that prosecutors want the Americans to first face trial before any kind of pardon or clemency is considered.
Typically, inmates released during Ramadan have already been convicted.

In some recent cases of high-profile foreigners jailed and released in Iran, authorities have first conducted trials and issued sentences.

In May, a French academic, Clotilde Reiss, was freed after her 10-year sentence on espionage-related charges was commuted. American freelance journalist Roxana Saberi was convicted of spying before being released in May 2009.

Canadian-Iranian journalist Maziar Bahari of Newsweek was freed on $300,000 bail in October 2009 after nearly four months detention following the crackdown after the disputed presidential election. He was later sentenced in absentia to more than 13 years in prison and 50 lashes.

In 2007, Iran released 15 British sailors without a trial after being held for nearly two weeks for allegedly crossing into Iran along its river border with Iraq. Some were paraded on television to deliver confessions for trespassing.

The delay in Shourd's release is sure to further fuel concerns over her health, which her family has said is deteriorating.

The 31-year-old has been held in solitary confinement, and her mother has said she's been denied treatment for serious health problems, including a breast lump and precancerous cervical cells.

Shourd's planned release had provided a long-sought sign of hope to the Americans' families, who have been pleading with Iranian officials to free their children since their arrest.

Now, they are once again left wondering what is going to happen.

"We don't know anything," said Samantha Topping, a New York publicist working with the families. She said the families knew only what they were hearing from media about a delayed release.
---
Associated Press writer Brian Murphy contributed to this report from Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/I/IRAN_US_HIKERS?SITE=NYNYP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

I chose this piece to talk about because I thought in general women are oppressed, but when you come up against a country that believes that women are a possession then we have some real problems. The Women in this piece were hiking from all accounts I for one would not know that I had crossed over into another country if it were me unless someone had told me. So I can say that I understand that they did not know what they had gotten themselves into. I am sure that on the mountain aren't any signs that state "hey another step and your in Iran or Iraq so watch where your steeping". I know that if there were signs considering that we don't want to have any issues with this country at this time I am sure they would not have gone over.

I just have a few questions. If this were a men would our country fight harder to get them home or at least some medical attention? I have heard of different situations where they have made some moves to get people out of a communist country. So why cant they do that in this situation? Do they want to wait for these women to be convicted to death or something? I am just a little curious. I can say that if the pictures are correct these are white women so at least race on the surface is not playing a part of this. I say on the surface because the people that are holding these women may have some type of prejudice against whites.

Do you think that in some way these women have offended someone and the man in charge feels they need to pay some cost? I am no sure, but I have to say that it caught my attention. That today in 2010 we still have men that are unwilling to see that they are oppressing women.

I feel very frustrated by the lack of action on our part as Americans, but who do we talk to. One of the women is in need of medications that are being denied her. She needs those to live. Why aren't we doing something? I know that we are in talks and that we want to avoid problems if we can, but this is something that could be easily handled I think. Let them go.

How could they be considered spy's? Were they on some watch list any where that says these women or women in general are all spy's. Sounds crazy I know, but no more crazy than these people who are holding these women without a trail and they are unwilling to give them medical treatment. So it is more than likely that they are not on any list of spy's, but they are American and that is seen as the enemy.

Funny how other countries stereotype us in the same manner that we stereotype people that we feel in less than us. Some countries view Americans a dogs. That they are lazy, thieves and good for nothing. Yet this is where they send there family members to establish business or to get an education to come back home and be of service to their people. It is very frustrating. I put the web page in my text so others can go on a see the interview that is listed.